Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sarah Van Emst vs Yajing Cao Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Emst vs Cao analysis and find out who is favored!
Sarah Van Emst vs Yajing Cao Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Emst 1 - 0 Cao
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Emst has won 46.13% of points on their second serve, while Cao has won 38.04%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Emst, in recent form, has won 60.17% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cao has won 52.12%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.87% and 36.2% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Emst has saved 50.65% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cao has saved 46.58% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Emst has won 63.04% of matches played (W/L 29/ 17), with Cao winning 43.33% (W/L 13/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Emst has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 73% (W/L 19/ 7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 10/ 13). Cao has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 17/ 19), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Emst has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 26/ 13), where as Cao has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.38% of matches (W/L 11/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Emst winning 1 times and Cao being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Emst winning 2 and Cao winning 0. The last match between Emst and Cao was at the W15 Sharm ElSheikh, 06-02-2024, Q3, Hard with Sarah Van Emst getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:29:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Emst and Cao have played a deciding set 0 times, with Emst winning 0 times and Cao 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Emst winning 0, and Cao 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Emst has played against opponents with an average rank of 125.57 while Cao has played against players with an average rank of 29.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Emst has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cao has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Emst has converted 48.51% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cao has converted 52.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
857
Rank
855
High
19
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
59% (29-20)
Career Total W/L
46% (17-20)
68% (15-7)
YTD W/L
36% (4-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Sarah Van Emst | Yajing Cao |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:0 | 1:29:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (31/51) | 65% (43/66) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (22/31) | 63% (27/43) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (11/20) | 26% (6/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (33/66) | 35% (18/51) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Sarah Van Emst
Player
Yajing Cao
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sarah Van Emst | Yajing Cao |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 68% (15/7) | 36% (4/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (31/20) | 42% (10/14) |
| Games Win/Loss | 58% (272/197) | 44% (97/121) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 77% (10/3) | 36% (4/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.09 | 0.04 |
| Aces Total | 20 | 4 |
| DFs per game | 0.36 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 84 | 25 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:54 | 1:5:32 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 85.64 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (699/1268) | 62% (301/485) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (447/699) | 56% (170/301) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (268/569) | 38% (70/184) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (92/191) | 52% (22/42) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (667/1361) | 42% (187/444) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Futures W/L | 68% (15/7) | 50% (4/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (14/21) | 36% (4/11) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 75% (6/8) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (10/9) | 67% (6/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (10/1) | 33% (6/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 42% (12/5) | 0% (5/0) |
Sarah Van Emst Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Garcia Cid
Player
Sarah Van Emst
80%
(
73 of
91)
1st Serve %
43%
(
30 of
69)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
5
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sarah Van Emst
Player
Marina Benito
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
6
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joelle Steur
Player
Sarah Van Emst
85%
(
79 of
93)
1st Serve %
48%
(
55 of
114)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
53%
(
42 of
79)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
48%
(
45 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
57 of
114)
105
Total Points Won
102
|
3-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sarah Van Emst
Player
Marina Markina
43%
(
15 of
35)
1st Serve %
49%
(
19 of
39)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
87%
(
13 of
15)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ariana Geerlings
Player
Sarah Van Emst
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
0
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
6
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
31 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sarah Van Emst
Player
Paula Arias Manjon
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-7(2) 5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sarah Van Emst
Player
Martina Genis Salas
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
57 of
83)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
12
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
65
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sarah Van Emst
Player
Marina Markina
48%
(
21 of
44)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
3
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ariana Geerlings
Player
Sarah Van Emst
82%
(
51 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Sarah Van Emst
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve %
45%
(
32 of
71)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Yajing Cao Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Jing-Jing Lu
Player
Yajing Cao
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yi Tsen Cho
Player
Yajing Cao
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
49
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 5-7 6-0 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jiayu Xu
Player
Yajing Cao
66%
(
75 of
114)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
97)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
47%
(
54 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
52 of
97)
112
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yajing Cao
Player
Chusiting Tong
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Unknown Player
Player
Yajing Cao
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yajing Cao
Player
Carolann Delaunay
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sarah Van Emst
Player
Yajing Cao
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Emst Vs Cao Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
